Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX F -WATER LEVELS AT THE COCKBURN WELL <br />Mr. Cockburn reported that his well, which is 240 feet deep, went dry during drilling <br />operations at the Bloomfield site and as a result of pumping at the test well on lot 22 on <br />November 15 and 22. On the later date, GeoTrans was notified at about 11:00 am that the <br />Cockburn well went dry after less than 3 hours of pumping had occurred and only about 150 <br />gallons had been pumped from the well. Unfortunately, the depth to water in the Cockburn <br />well was below 155 feet bgs between mid-day on November 21 and the morning of <br />November 23; thus, no data are available to examine water-level changes immediately <br />before, during, or after the November 22 test. By comparison, on November 15, while <br />Valley Drilling pumped approximately 1300 gallons from the well between 9:00 am and 5:00 <br />pm (see test data in Appendix C), the water-level in the Cockburn well was rising and did not <br />decline until after the test had ended (Figure F-1). Also, as shown in Figure 12 of the <br />hydrogeologic report, pumping at the lot 22 test well caused no measurable drawdown in <br />nearby test wells on lots 21 and 23, and did not affect the Bigley well, which is between the <br />test well and the Cockburn well. Furthermore, aquifer testing associated with the <br />hydrogeologic study did not cause discernable drawdown at any of the offsite wells. The <br />Cockburn well is approximately 1700 feet from the lot 22 test well. Given the small volume <br />of water (480 gallons) pumped from test we1122 during the aquifer test on November 22, it <br />would be very surprising if pumping at this well caused drawdown at the Cockburn well. <br />Better resolution of the cause of changing water levels in the Cockburn well would be <br />facilitated by installation of an automated water-level recording device to a depth just above <br />the pump intake (which will require pulling and re-setting the pump). J.R. Gould Enterprises <br />is willing to provide Mr. Cockburn with a new well if pumping at the proposed subdivision <br />site is shown to cause his well to go `dry'. <br />Final Hydrogeologic Sludy of the Bloomfield Subdivsion Site <br />December 2005 <br />22 <br />