My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Dupont Fabros Devel_Hydrostudy
>
Hydro Studies
>
Dupont Fabros Development_Ashburn Business Park
>
Dupont Fabros Devel_Hydrostudy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2010 12:21:18 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 12:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
HD-HydroStudies
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ~N CALINry <br /> ~s Loudoun County, Virginia <br /> www.loudoun.gov <br /> Department of Building and Development <br /> 1757 ' 1 Harrison Street, S.E., P. O. Box 7000, Mailstop #60A, Leesburg, VA 20177-7000 <br /> (703) 777-0220 <br /> FAX Numbers: Permits (703) 771-5522 - Engineering (703) 737-8993 <br /> Zoning & Administration (703) 771-5215 <br /> <br /> Michael Maloy, CPG September 14, 2010 <br /> Senior Geologist, Principal <br /> Analytical Services, Inc. <br /> 402 N West Street <br /> Culpeper, VA 22701 <br /> <br /> Re: Review of "Detailed Hydrogeologic Report for the Dupont Fabros Facility, Ashburn, VA." <br /> Dear Mr. Maloy, <br /> <br /> The Loudoun County Dept. of Building and Development, Water Resources Team staff has <br /> completed its review of the above referenced hydrogeologic study dated June 25, 2010, and <br /> received by the County on August 13, 2010. This review determines if the document has met all <br /> requirements as defined by chapter 6.240 of the Facilities Standards Manual (FSM). This review <br /> does not imply approval or disapproval of the report. <br /> Staff has the following requirements: <br /> 1) The Hydrogeologic Report does not firmly establish what the proposed groundwater <br /> usage rate will be. Please provide narrative describing the rate and duration of <br /> proposed withdrawals, including a proposed pumping plan for each production well. <br /> Staff cannot determine if groundwater resources are adequate without a clearly defined <br /> proposed usage. <br /> 2) Section 6.240.) requires an analysis and evaluation of the impact of groundwater <br /> withdrawals on the groundwater and surface water resources including the impact on <br /> surrounding water supply wells. Although staff realizes that there are no groundwater <br /> supply wells proximal to the study site, the report does not show this. Please add a <br /> section to the report that clearly shows locations of the nearest water supply wells and <br /> surface water bodies relative to the proposed productions wells, and provide discussion <br /> of possible impacts. <br /> Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. <br /> <br /> Sin ly, <br /> <br /> Dennis H. Cumbie, CPG <br /> Hydrogeologist <br /> <br /> Cc: Jeff Widmeyer, LCHD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.